We believe in an editorial in the Washington Post. But no, it's in the New York Times, normally rather pro-French ...
    - "What France can do"
    The editorial (in the edition of yesterday) reflects pretty much annoyance U.S..

He explained that the French president "got almost everything he could hope for"His visit to the United States. "Now he must return the favor by increasing significantly"The number of combat troops in Afghanistan.

The New York Times points out that Nicolas Sarkozy, weakened by the regional elections, needed a "Boost. Barack Obama has no butt (though he refused the operation of the interview in the Oval Office or dinner "private" with photos ..)
 
The French president has snatched a dinner with his wife who is "certainly good effect"In Paris. He obtained a promise of competition "Open and fair" EADS.
And the Obama administration had the tact not to mention his refusal to do its part cons "the common enemy "Afghanistan (France has offered only 80 trainers, reports the New York Times. In American eyes, "A 2-figure number"Is the effect of an insult).

Nicolas Sarkozy went to Columbia University to say that America must be a nation "listening“. 
    - “That Is True"Said the New York Times.